ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural network embedding of functional microconnectome.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mutual generation in neuronal activity across the brain via deep neural approach, and its network interpretation.Communications biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our brains operate as a complex network of interconnected neurons. To gain a deeper understanding of this network architecture, it is essential to extract simple rules from its intricate structure. This study aimed to compress and simplify the architecture, with a particular focus on interpreting patterns of functional connectivity in 2.5 hr of electrical activity from a vast number of neurons in acutely sliced mouse brains. Here, we combined two distinct methods together: automatic compression and network analysis. Firstly, for automatic compression, we trained an artificial neural network named NNE (neural network embedding). This allowed us to reduce the connectivity to features, be represented only by 13% of the original neuron count. Secondly, to decipher the topology, we concentrated on the variability among the compressed features and compared them with 15 distinct network metrics. Specifically, we introduced new metrics that had not previously existed, termed as indirect-adjacent degree and neighbor hub ratio. Our results conclusively demonstrated that these new metrics could better explain approximately 40%-45% of the features. This finding highlighted the critical role of NNE in facilitating the development of innovative metrics, because some of the features extracted by NNE were not captured by the currently existed network metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.