Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161994›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Neural network embedding of functional microconnectome.

Arata Shirakami, Takeshi Hase, Yuki Yamaguchi, Masanori Shimono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arata ShirakamiGraduate Schools of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi HaseThe Systems Biology Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki YamaguchiGraduate Schools of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanori ShimonoGraduate Schools of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our brains operate as a complex network of interconnected neurons. To gain a deeper understanding of this network architecture, it is essential to extract simple rules from its intricate structure. This study aimed to compress and simplify the architecture, with a particular focus on interpreting patterns of functional connectivity in 2.5 hr of electrical activity from a vast number of neurons in acutely sliced mouse brains. Here, we combined two distinct methods together: automatic compression and network analysis. Firstly, for automatic compression, we trained an artificial neural network named NNE (neural network embedding). This allowed us to reduce the connectivity to features, be represented only by 13% of the original neuron count. Secondly, to decipher the topology, we concentrated on the variability among the compressed features and compared them with 15 distinct network metrics. Specifically, we introduced new metrics that had not previously existed, termed as indirect-adjacent degree and neighbor hub ratio. Our results conclusively demonstrated that these new metrics could better explain approximately 40%-45% of the features. This finding highlighted the critical role of NNE in facilitating the development of innovative metrics, because some of the features extracted by NNE were not captured by the currently existed network metrics.

Indexed as

CentralityIndirect-adjacent degreeMicroconnectomeNeighbor hub ratioNetwork embeddingNeural networksNew metrics

Identifiers

PMID40161994
PMCPMC11949542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.