Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161988›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Combined topological and spatial constraints are required to capture the structure of neural connectomes.

Anastasiya Salova, István A Kovács

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Physical contact reveals a hidden layer of cortical architecture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Variation in high-amplitude events across the human lifespan.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Network dismantling by physical damage.Communications physics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anastasiya SalovaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
István A KovácsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-6277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric brain reconstructions provide an unprecedented opportunity to gain insights into the complex connectivity patterns of neurons in an increasing number of organisms. Here, we model and quantify the complexity of the resulting neural connectomes in the fruit fly, mouse, and human and unveil a simple set of shared organizing principles across these organisms. To put the connectomes in a physical context, we also construct contactomes, the network of neurons in physical contact in each organism. With these, we establish that physical constraints-either given by pairwise distances or the contactome-play a crucial role in shaping the network structure. For example, neuron positions are highly optimal in terms of distance from their neighbors. Yet, spatial constraints alone cannot capture the network topology, including the broad degree distribution. Conversely, the degree sequence alone is insufficient to recover the spatial structure. We resolve this apparent mismatch by formulating scalable maximum entropy models, incorporating both types of constraints. The resulting generative models have predictive power beyond the input data, as they capture several additional biological and network characteristics, like synaptic weights and graphlet statistics.

Indexed as

Distance dependenceGraphletsMaximum entropyNeural connectomeNeural contactomePhysical constraints

Identifiers

PMID40161988
PMCPMC11949549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.