Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161986›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Whole-brain causal discovery using fMRI.

Fahimeh Arab, AmirEmad Ghassami, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Megan A K Peters, Erfan Nozari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Second-order instantaneous causal analysis of spontaneous MEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fahimeh ArabDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-0406
AmirEmad GhassamiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-2231
Hamidreza JamalabadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Phillips University of Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-2374
Megan A K PetersDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-0816
Erfan NozariDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-8959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant research, discovering causal relationships from fMRI remains a challenge. Popular methods such as Granger causality and dynamic causal modeling fall short in handling contemporaneous effects and latent common causes. Methods from causal structure learning literature can address these limitations but often scale poorly with network size and need acyclicity. In this study, we first provide a taxonomy of existing methods and compare their accuracy and efficiency on simulated fMRI from simple topologies. This analysis demonstrates a pressing need for more accurate and scalable methods, motivating the design of Causal discovery for Large-scale Low-resolution Time-series with Feedback (CaLLTiF). CaLLTiF is a constraint-based method that uses conditional independence between contemporaneous and lagged variables to extract causal relationships. On simulated fMRI from the macaque connectome, CaLLTiF achieves significantly higher accuracy and scalability than all tested alternatives. From resting-state human fMRI, CaLLTiF learns causal connectomes that are highly consistent across individuals, show clear top-down flow of causal effect from attention and default mode to sensorimotor networks, exhibit Euclidean distance dependence in causal interactions, and are highly dominated by contemporaneous effects. Overall, this work takes a major step in enhancing causal discovery from whole-brain fMRI and defines a new standard for future investigations.

Indexed as

Brain networksCausal discoveryCognitive neurosciencefMRIStatistical algorithms

Identifiers

PMID40161986
PMCPMC11949584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.