ArticleBioImpacts : BI2025
Fabrication and characterization of nanocomposite scaffold containing zinc-doped mesoporous bioglass: Evaluation of the antioxidant properties, hemocompatibility and proliferation of apical papilla stem cells.
Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Robocast Zn- and Co-doped bioactive glass/tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nanocomposite scaffolds comprising mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) were able to increase the viability, proliferation, and growth of stem cells in vitro, rendering them promising candidates for dental root tissue regeneration. Methods: The Sol-Gel process was utilized for the synthesis of MBG and zinc-doped MBG (Zn-MBG), the latter being integrated into alginate/chitosan scaffolds which in turn were cross-linked to strengthen mechanical properties, followed by freeze-drying. The scaffold's physicochemical characterizations were evaluated, followed by investigations of its antioxidant properties, swelling behavior, mechanical properties, and porosity. The capacity of these biomaterials to increase cell viability and growth of apical papilla stem cells (SCAPs) and hemocompatibility was assessed as a final step. Results: All fabricated scaffolds demonstrated proper porosity, biocompatibility, and hemocompatibility. Nanocomposite scaffolds with Zn-MBG presented a significant enhancement in cell viability for SCAPs compared to alginate/chitosan scaffolds. DPPH tests indicated that the Zn-MBG-alginate/chitosan scaffold showed the highest antioxidant properties. Conclusion: Zn-MBG-alginate/chitosan nanocomposite scaffolds demonstrated great physicochemical characteristics and biological and mechanical properties, marking them as suitable candidates for dental root tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.