ArticleBioImpacts : BI2025
An update on technical method of cartilage decellularization: A physical-based protocol.
Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Biomaterials for Osteochondral Repair: From Source to Strategy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Fabrication of a Bioactive Human Adipose Extracellular Matrix Allograft Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- From biological scaffold to multifunctional bioplatform: research progress and applications of decellularized extracellular matrix.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of curcumin-based scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite advances in orthopedic surgery, the lack of effective conventional treatment for cartilage defects has led to research in cartilage tissue engineering. One of the interesting topics is the use of decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) as a suitable natural scaffold that supports the growth and function of cells cultured in it. A concern with decellularization protocols, especially those with high detergent concentrations, is the disruption of native ECM, which has deleterious effects on subsequent scaffold recellularization. Therefore, this study focused on optimizing cartilage decellularization by physical methods without the use of ionic detergents. Methods: The bovine tracheal cartilage fragments were decellularized by a combination of 8 cycles of freeze-thaw and ultrasound techniques. Then, the tissues were immersed and shaken in 0.25% trypsin for 24 hours. Efficient cell removal and preservation of ECM were confirmed by histological and cytocompatibility assessments. The in-vivo studies were performed to evaluate the biocompatibility and bioactivity of the scaffold. Results: The histological assessments indicated the appropriate cytocompatibility and the fibroblast cell culture study demonstrated that cells were able to proliferate and migrate on the decellularized cartilage. In-vivo evaluation also showed a reduced adverse immune response, including leukocyte infiltration into the ECM. Conclusion: These results suggest that a cartilage scaffold created using a physical decellularization protocol that efficiently removes cells while preserving the native ECM can be a suitable scaffold for cartilage reconstruction. The main advantage of this protocol is the absence of potentially toxic chemicals in the tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.