Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161937›Full record

ReviewBioImpacts : BI2025

Material synthesis and design optimization of biomaterials for biomedical implant applications.

Nilesh Tipan, Ajay Pandey, Pushyamitra Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nilesh TipanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal (M.P.), India, 462003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-6471
Ajay PandeyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal (M.P.), India, 462003.
Pushyamitra MishraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal (M.P.), India, 462003.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the modern era, the use of biomaterials in orthopaedics has revolutionised the healthcare sector. Traditionally, some non-biodegradable materials such as titanium and stainless steel are used as biomaterials. However, issues such as toxicity, poor tissue adhesion, and stress-shielding effect can occur with non-biodegradable materials for bone fracture fixation. Several biodegradable materials have been developed to resolve these issues but have not yet been appropriately industrialized for implant applications. These substances can be classified into metals, ceramics, and polymers, which can be blended to create composites that enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics. Methods: This study began by contrasting the biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among various alloys: biodegradable low entropy (BLE) alloys, biodegradable medium entropy (BME) alloys, biodegradable high entropy (BHE) alloys, and non-biodegradable medium entropy (NBME) alloys. Additionally, the design morphology of bio-implants like plates, screws, and others was inspected. Moreover, a meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the design of biomaterials, ensuring appropriate biocompatibility and degradation rate. A subsequent statistical analysis was executed to determine the optimal material concentration for bio-implant alloy creation. Results: Initially, in this paper, the advantages of biodegradable materials over conventional non-biodegradable materials are discussed and bibliometric analysis is done to show recent research contributions in the field of biomedical implant application. Then compared biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among BLE alloys, BME alloys, BHE alloys, NBME alloys. Furthermore, investigated the design morphology of bio-implants such as plates and screws. Also presented a meta-analysis for design optimization of biomaterials to meet suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates and presented a statistical analysis among them, which helps to select the appropriate material concentration for bio-implant alloy formation. Conclusion: It was observed that in biodegradable materials, tensile strength is in the pattern of NBME > BHE > BME > BLE, and the degradation rate is in the pattern of BME > NBME > BHE > BLE. This study suggests that biodegradable materials (BLE and BME) are a much better choice than non-biodegradable materials in orthopaedic applications. It was also observed that a Biodegradable locking compression plate (BLCP) can provide the necessary strength and performance. Further, the systematic meta-analysis presented herein furnishes crucial data to researchers, guiding them in enhancing the efficiency of diverse biomaterials and optimizing their designs.

Indexed as

BiodegradableBiomaterialsDesign morphologyImplantLow medium and high entropy alloysStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID40161937
PMCPMC11954756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.