ReviewBioImpacts : BI2025
Material synthesis and design optimization of biomaterials for biomedical implant applications.
Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart integrated biomaterial systems for precision and optimized delivery of MSCs and their exosomes: Transforming wound healing and organ regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Advanced additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a comprehensive review of biomaterials, structural design, biological functions and clinical technology applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the modern era, the use of biomaterials in orthopaedics has revolutionised the healthcare sector. Traditionally, some non-biodegradable materials such as titanium and stainless steel are used as biomaterials. However, issues such as toxicity, poor tissue adhesion, and stress-shielding effect can occur with non-biodegradable materials for bone fracture fixation. Several biodegradable materials have been developed to resolve these issues but have not yet been appropriately industrialized for implant applications. These substances can be classified into metals, ceramics, and polymers, which can be blended to create composites that enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics. Methods: This study began by contrasting the biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among various alloys: biodegradable low entropy (BLE) alloys, biodegradable medium entropy (BME) alloys, biodegradable high entropy (BHE) alloys, and non-biodegradable medium entropy (NBME) alloys. Additionally, the design morphology of bio-implants like plates, screws, and others was inspected. Moreover, a meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the design of biomaterials, ensuring appropriate biocompatibility and degradation rate. A subsequent statistical analysis was executed to determine the optimal material concentration for bio-implant alloy creation. Results: Initially, in this paper, the advantages of biodegradable materials over conventional non-biodegradable materials are discussed and bibliometric analysis is done to show recent research contributions in the field of biomedical implant application. Then compared biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility among BLE alloys, BME alloys, BHE alloys, NBME alloys. Furthermore, investigated the design morphology of bio-implants such as plates and screws. Also presented a meta-analysis for design optimization of biomaterials to meet suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates and presented a statistical analysis among them, which helps to select the appropriate material concentration for bio-implant alloy formation. Conclusion: It was observed that in biodegradable materials, tensile strength is in the pattern of NBME > BHE > BME > BLE, and the degradation rate is in the pattern of BME > NBME > BHE > BLE. This study suggests that biodegradable materials (BLE and BME) are a much better choice than non-biodegradable materials in orthopaedic applications. It was also observed that a Biodegradable locking compression plate (BLCP) can provide the necessary strength and performance. Further, the systematic meta-analysis presented herein furnishes crucial data to researchers, guiding them in enhancing the efficiency of diverse biomaterials and optimizing their designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.