Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161906›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Effect of different volumes of bupivacaine 0.25% caudal blocks on cardiac index measured by electrical cardiometry in children undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries: A randomised controlled trial.

Khaled Sarhan, Maha Gebreel, Ashgan Raouf, Islam Reda, Mohammed Ameen, Rana Walaa, Nazmy Seif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khaled SarhanDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-3831
Maha GebreelDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7163-2769
Ashgan RaoufDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-4346
Islam RedaDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-7200
Mohammed AmeenDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3202-6598
Rana WalaaDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1979-6144
Nazmy SeifDepartment of Anaesthesia, SICU and Pain Management, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-3671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Studies assessing caudal block's effects on children's cardiac output are scarce. We aimed to estimate the effects of the caudal block using different volumes of plain bupivacaine 0.25% on the cardiac index assessed by electrical cardiometry. Methods: Children aged 1-8 years undergoing minor lower abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to one of three equal groups: The 0.8 group received general anaesthesia (GA) along with caudal block with 0.8 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, the 1.2 group received GA along with caudal block with 1.2 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%, and the control group received GA only. The primary outcome was the percentage of change in the cardiac index from the baseline 10 minutes after the caudal block. Continuous variables were analysed using the ANOVA test, while categorical data was analysed using a chi-squared test with the significance level set at Results: The mean percentage of change of cardiac index from baseline 10 minutes after caudal block was significantly lower in the 0.8 and 1.2 groups (-11.4 (standard deviation (SD): 12.5%) and -17.1 (SD: 15.5%), respectively) compared to the control group (-0.7 (SD: 11.5%), ( Conclusion: The cardiac index progressively decreased with the increase in the volume of the caudal block with plain bupivacaine at 0.25% compared to the baseline. However, this decrease was not clinically significant, suggesting that the cardiac index remained within an acceptable range after the caudal block. Nevertheless, caution is warranted due to the increased incidence of hypotension with increasing volumes of plain local anaesthetics in the caudal block.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiabupivacainecardiac indexcardiac outputcaudal blockchildrenhypotensionregional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40161906
PMCPMC11952167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.