Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161819›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

High-Density Multi-Distance fNIRS Enhances Detection of Brain Activity during a Word-Color Stroop Task.

Jessica E Anderson, Laura Carlton, Sreekanth Kura, Walker J O'Brien, De'Ja Rogers, Parisa Rahimi, Parya Y Farzam, Muhammad H Zaman, David A Boas, Meryem A Yücel

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica E AndersonNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-4549-8717
Laura CarltonNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0009-0008-0337-686X
Sreekanth KuraNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Walker J O'BrienNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0009-0006-0920-3869
De'Ja RogersNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-4324
Parisa RahimiQuestrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Parya Y FarzamNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Muhammad H ZamanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
David A BoasNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-6709-7711
Meryem A YücelNeurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-2847

Funding

The Neuroscience of Everyday World- A novel wearable system for continuous measurement of brain functionU01EB029856 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BOAS, DAVID A, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2020 to 2024
$6.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB029856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) enables neuroimaging in scenarios where other modalities are less suitable, such as during motion tasks or in low-resource environments. Sparse fNIRS arrays with 30mm channel spacing are widely used but have limited spatial resolution. High-density (HD) arrays with overlapping, multi-distance channels improve sensitivity and localization but increase costs and setup times. A statistical comparison of HD and sparse arrays is needed for evaluating the benefits and trade-offs of HD arrays. Aim: This study provides a statistical comparison of HD and sparse fNIRS performance to inform array selection in future research. Approach: We measured prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during congruent and incongruent Word-Color Stroop (WCS) tasks using both Sparse and HD arrays for 17 healthy adult participants, comparing dorsolateral PFC channel and image results at the group level. Results: While both arrays detected activation in channel space during incongruent WCS, channel and image space results demonstrated superior localization and sensitivity with the HD array for all WCS. Conclusions: Sparse channel data may suitably detect activation from cognitively demanding tasks, like incongruent WCS. However, the HD array outperformed Sparse in detecting and localizing brain activity in image space, particularly during lower cognitive load tasks, making them more suitable for neuroimaging applications.

Indexed as

Diffuse Optical TomographyfNIRSHigh-Density fNIRSPre-Frontal CortexWord-Color Stroop

Identifiers

PMID40161819
PMCPMC11952576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.