ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Continuous FACS sorting of double emulsion picoreactors with a 3D printed vertical mixer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput screening and directed evolution using microfluidic picoreactors have produced high-activity enzymes. In this approach, a substrate is co-encapsulated with a candidate enzyme and individual picoreactors are sorted based on an activity reporter. While many approaches use water-in-oil droplets (single emulsions) for fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS) on custom-fabricated microfluidic devices that require integrated optics and electronics, recent approaches have lowered the engineering barriers to adoption by using simple microfluidic droplet generators to produce water-in-oil-in-water droplets (double emulsion picoreactors, DEs) that can be sorted with commercial FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting). Despite the simplified engineering requirements, high variability in loading rates and low yield during loading are barriers to efficient DE FACS sorting. Here, we optimized surfactants to enhance DE stability and demonstrated that a 3D-printed corkscrew on the sample line acts as a vertical mixer to enable more continuous loading. With these optimized loading conditions, we analyzed 1.17 million DEs in four 10-minute sorting rounds with a mean frequency of 480 Hz (390 Hz including sample exchanges); in a mock sort of 10% fluorescent DEs, we achieved 89.2±1.1% accuracy and 78±0.9% recovery with our optimized loading protocol. Overall, improved ease-of-use and throughput for FACS sortable DEs should expand the accessibility of directed evolution in controlled
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.