Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161552›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025

The effect of isolated tumor cells on adjuvant treatment decisions for patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective case series.

Camryn Kenkel, Sarah S Lee, Naaman Mehta, Jude Nawlo, Edward Jimenez, Leslie R Boyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camryn KenkelNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Sarah S LeeDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Naaman MehtaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Jude NawloDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Edward JimenezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States.
Leslie R BoydDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Health. 240 E 38th St, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for endometrial cancer staging may identify isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Although guidelines do not classify nodes with ITCs as positive, earlier papers reported that a significant proportion of gynecologic oncologists treat ITCs as they would positive nodes. The objective of this study was to examine practice patterns and determine if the presence of ITCs in endometrial cancer affects adjuvant treatment decision-making. Methods: This was a retrospective series of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma stages I to IIIB who underwent surgical staging with SNLB from July 2016 to January 2022 at three hospitals. The primary outcome of interest was the receipt of adjuvant treatment. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney Results: Of seven hundred thirty-four patients included, ITCs were identified in 41 patients (5.6 %). Deep myometrial invasion (61.0 % vs 20.5 %, p < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (58.4 % vs 17.7 %, p < 0.001) were more common in patients with ITCs than in those with negative lymph nodes. Patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (30 of 41, 73.2 % vs 289 of 693, 41.7 %, p < 0.001). When controlling for age, stage, histology, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, ITCs were not associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy receipt. Conclusions: Although patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment, this was accounted for by other clinical and histological factors. Clinicians were likely to make decisions based on established risk factors, and more data are needed on the role of ITCs in the landscape of molecularly based decision making.

Identifiers

PMID40161552
PMCPMC11954112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.