ReviewRSC advances2025
Three-dimensional bio-derived materials for biomedical applications: challenges and opportunities.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bio-boosting transplants: a systematic review on biopolymers in vascular composite allotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Thermo- and pH-Responsive Antimicrobial Hydrogels from Poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) and Cationic-Modified Chitosan for Sustained Papain Release.ACS polymers Au · 2026Article
- Sustainable Hydrogels in Water Treatment-A Short Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bio-derived materials are emerging as a promising approach to enhance wound healing therapies. These innovative materials can be tailored to meet the specific needs of various wound types and patients, facilitating the controlled release of therapeutic agents such as growth factors and antibiotics, which promote cell growth and tissue regeneration. Despite their potential, significant challenges remain in achieving optimal biocompatibility, ensuring structural integrity, and maintaining precise release mechanisms. Additionally, issues such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory compliance pose substantial barriers to widespread use. However, recent advances in materials science and interdisciplinary research offer new opportunities to overcome these challenges. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of 3D bio-derived materials in biomedical applications, highlighting the types of materials available, their advantages and limitations, and the progress made in their design and development. It also outlines new directions for future research aimed at bridging the gap between scientific discoveries and their practical applications in injury healing strategies. The findings of this review underscore the significant potential of 3D bio-derived materials in revolutionizing wound healing and advancing personalized therapeutic approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.