ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Effects of an active ankle exoskeleton on the walking biomechanics of healthy men.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Muscle myography for human-machine interfaces: a review of sensing modalities and control interfaces.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effect of walking with an active ankle exoskeleton on the biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Active lower-body exoskeleton devices can decrease the energy requirement of the human body by providing mechanical assistance to lower-body muscles. However, they also alter gait kinematics and kinetics, and it is not well understood whether such alterations are detrimental or beneficial to the human body. In this pilot study, we investigated the impact of walking with an ankle exoskeleton device on the biomechanics of men while carrying a heavy load. We collected computed tomography images and motion-capture data for five young, healthy men who walked 5 km (∼60 min) with a 22.7-kg load, with and without an active ankle exoskeleton (the ExoBoot EB60). We developed personalized musculoskeletal models and calculated the joint kinematics and kinetics for each participant under each walking condition. Without the ExoBoot, at 5 km compared to 0 km, on average, the peak trunk flexion angle increased by ∼35% and the stride length increased by ∼3.5%. In contrast, with the ExoBoot, the magnitude of the corresponding increases was smaller (∼16% and ∼2%, respectively). After the 5-km walk, compared to walking without the ExoBoot, its use considerably altered hip-related biomechanical parameters, e.g., it increased hip abduction angle by ∼17%, increased hip flexion moment by ∼3.5%, and decreased hip adduction moment by ∼19%. Finally, irrespective of distance, ExoBoot use significantly increased the stance duration and peak ankle plantarflexion angle (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.