ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025
Associations among blood biomarkers, clinical subtypes, and prognosis in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decode the Ubiquitinome in Parkinson's Disease: From Pathological Aggregates to Targeted DUB Therapeutics.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Review
- Machine learning integration of serial blood biomarkers enhances cognitive decline prediction in early Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of the poor prognosis subtype by surrogate markers would be advantageous for selecting treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of the present study was to test whether plasma neurofilament light chain (NF-L), total tau (t-tau), ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), fatty acid-binding protein 3 (FABP3), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) can be used as prognostic biomarkers in PD. Methods: In the present study, both retrospective and prospective studies were performed. Plasma samples at baseline from 81 PD patients were included in the prospective study. Plasma samples at baseline from 60 patients who underwent cognitive assessment were subjected to the hierarchical cluster analysis for a retrospective study. Results: On the basis of the results of the cluster analysis, patients were classified into three groups: groups (G)1, G2 and G3. Individuals in the G1 cluster, who had an older age at onset and were prone to early progression with dementia, had significantly greater plasma NF-L levels than those in the G3 cluster, who did not present with dementia at an early stage. A Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age and sex revealed that high NF-L and UCH-L1 levels at baseline predicted the four future milestones (i.e., nursing care, dysphagia, wheelchair use, and repeated falls), and high plasma t-tau at baseline predicted future dysphagia. Conclusions: Although further studies with a larger number of patients will be required, plasma NF-L may be a useful biomarker for identifying the rapidly progressive subtype of PD, and plasma NF-L and UCH-L1 may serve as biomarkers of overall PD prognosis, whereas plasma t-tau could be a biomarker for future dysphagia in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.