ArticleOphthalmology science
Impact of Elevated Intraocular Pressure on Lamina Cribrosa Oxygenation: A Combined Experimental-Computational Study on Monkeys.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in the nonlinear and viscoelastic mechanical properties of the rat lamina cribrosa under chronic high intraocular pressure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Unraveling causal pathways in retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Review
- Lamina Cribrosa Hypoxia Sensitivity to Variations of Anatomy and Vascular Factors.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025Article
- Risk Factors and Genetic Markers Associated with the Development and Progression of Glaucoma: A Review.Journal of current glaucoma practiceReview
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate how lamina cribrosa (LC) oxygenation is affected by tissue distortions resulting from elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Design: Experimental study on 4 monkeys, histology, and computational analysis. Subjects: Four healthy monkey eyes with OCT scans at IOPs of 10 to 60 mmHg. Methods: Intraocular pressure-induced LC tissue deformations of a healthy monkey were measured in vivo using OCT images and digital volume correlation analysis techniques. Three-dimensional eye-specific models of the LC vasculature of 4 healthy monkey eyes were reconstructed using histology. The models were then used to compute LC oxygenation, first as reconstructed (baseline), and then with the LC vessels distorted according to the OCT-derived deformations. Two biomechanics-based mapping techniques were evaluated: cross-sectional and isotropic. The hemodynamics and oxygenations of the 4 LC vessel networks were evaluated at IOPs up to 60 mmHg to quantify the effects of IOP on LC oxygen supply, assorting the extent of LC tissue mild and severe hypoxia. Main Outcome Measures: Intraocular pressure-induced deformation, vasculature structure, blood supply, and LC oxygenation. Results: Intraocular pressure-induced deformations reduced LC oxygenation significantly and substantially. More than 20% of LC tissue suffered from mild hypoxia when IOP reached 30 mmHg. Extreme IOP (>50 mmHg) led to large severe hypoxia regions (>30%) in the isotropic mapping cases. Conclusions: Our calculations predicted that moderately elevated IOP can lead to mild hypoxia in a substantial part of the LC, which, if sustained chronically, may contribute to neural tissue damage. For extreme IOP elevations, severe hypoxia was predicted, which would likely cause more immediate damage. Our findings suggest that despite the remarkable LC vascular robustness, IOP-induced distortions can potentially contribute to glaucomatous neuropathy. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.