ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Predicting Porosity in Grain Compression Experiments Using Random Forest and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Thermal State Field Forecasting Framework for Intelligent Ventilation Decision-Making in Granary Based on a Hierarchical TCN-Mamba Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A smart assistive system for visually challenged people through efficient object detection using deep learning with tunicate swarm algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grain stored for long periods is highly susceptible to localized condensation, mold growth, and insect infestations, leading to significant storage losses. These issues are particularly acute in large-capacity bungalow warehouses, where food security concerns are even more pronounced. The porosity of grain piles is a critical parameter that influences heat and moisture transfer within the grain mass, as well as the ventilation of grain storage. To investigate the distribution pattern of bulk grain pile porosity in bungalow warehouses, this study employs machine learning (ML) techniques to predict grain pile porosity based on compression experiments. Four metaheuristic optimization algorithms-particle swarm optimization (PSO), gray wolf optimizer (GWO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), and tunicate swarm algorithm (TSA)-were introduced to enhance the random forest (RF) algorithm, and five ML-based models (RF, PSO-RF, GWO-RF, SCA-RF, and TSA-RF) for predicting grain porosity were developed. The predictive performance of the five models was analyzed using error analysis, Taylor diagrams, evaluation metrics, and multi-criteria assessments to identify the optimal ML prediction model. The results indicate that the predictive performance of the four RF-based hybrid models surpasses that of the single RF model. Among these hybrid models, the TSA-RF model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.