Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161380›Full record

ArticleCurrent pharmacology reports2023

Rapid diagnostics to enhance therapy selection for the treatment of bacterial infections.

HaYoung Ryu, Ahmed Abdul Azim, Pinki J Bhatt, Priyanka Uprety, Sana Mohayya, Deepali Dixit, Thomas J Kirn, Navaneeth Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current pharmacology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

HaYoung RyuDepartment of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Sciences University Hospital and Clinics, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Ahmed Abdul AzimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Pinki J BhattDivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Priyanka UpretyBecton, Dickinson and Company, Life Sciences- Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, Sparks, MD, USA.
Sana MohayyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Deepali DixitDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Thomas J KirnDivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Navaneeth NarayananDivision of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Gut Microbiome and Pharmacokinetic Variability in Tuberculosis and DiabetesK23AI159396 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Navaneeth Narayanan · 2022 to 2026
$998k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI159396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may reduce morbidity and mortality related to bacterial infections by reducing time to identification of pathogens and antibiotic resistance mechanisms. There has been a significant increase in the breadth and depth of available technology utilized by RDTs. Recent findings: There are numerous Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assays for rapid detection of bacteria from various specimen types from sites including blood, stool, central nervous system and respiratory tract. Most RDTs currently FDA-cleared are molecular tests designed as syndromic panels that provide identification of on-panel organisms and resistance genes. One FDA-cleared rapid phenotypic assay for antimicrobial susceptibility testing is currently available and others are in development. Studies of these technologies' clinical impact consistently demonstrate improvements in clinical care processes such as time to de-escalation and escalation of antibiotic therapy particularly for blood and respiratory specimen tests. Other RDTs show inconsistent impact on antibiotic use. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are vital to ensure the greatest benefit from RDTs in clinical practice. Summary: The advancement and implementation of RDTs, in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship, to enhance treatment selection for bacterial infections should be regarded as a core element to improve clinical outcomes for patients. Although challenges exist in the use of RDTs, there is a need for continued innovation in technology, implementation science and collaboration across clinical professions to optimize care.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipbacterial infectionsclinical microbiologyrapid diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID40161380
PMCPMC11951845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.