Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161343›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Back pain in the midwifery profession in northern Poland.

Aleksandra Bryndal, Sebastian Glowinski, Kazimiera Hebel, Agnieszka Grochulska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleksandra Bryndal *Institute of Health Sciences, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Slupsk, Poland.
Sebastian Glowinski *Institute of Health Sciences, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Slupsk, Poland.
Kazimiera HebelInstitute of Health Sciences, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Slupsk, Poland.
Agnieszka GrochulskaInstitute of Health Sciences, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Slupsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neck pain (NP) and low back pain (LBP) are increasingly significant medical, social, and economic concerns. The midwifery profession, similar to other healthcare occupations, is particularly predisposed to these issues. Methods: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of back pain among midwives and evaluate the associated disability levels using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The study group included 208 actively practicing midwives aged 23 to 67 years (mean ± SD: 48.1 ± 10.7 years). Participants completed an anonymous survey comprising a custom-designed questionnaire, the Polish language versions of the NDI and ODI, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain intensity. Results: The analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between VAS pain intensity and both age ( Conclusions: Neck and low back pain represent prevalent and impactful issues for midwives in Poland, contributing to mild to moderate disability, absenteeism, reliance on pain medication, and limited physical activity. Key contributing factors include age, professional experience, BMI, and low levels of physical activity.

Indexed as

Back PainLow Back PainMidwiferyOccupational DiseasesAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPain MeasurementPolandPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesLow back painMedical staffMidwifeNDINeck painODI

Identifiers

PMID40161343
PMCPMC11954461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.