ArticlePeerJ2025
Assessment of liquid media requirements for storing and evaluating respiratory cilia motility.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining minimum media requirements forPeerJ · 2026Article
- A Simple Method for Imaging and Quantifying Respiratory Cilia Motility in Mouse Models.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucociliary clearance is critical for maintaining normal lung function. Respiratory cilia which drive mucociliary clearance are commonly studied by measuring cilia beat frequency (CBF). There is currently significant variation within the literature regarding what is a normal value for CBF, this may be due in part to the large variety of liquid media used to suspend, maintain, and image ciliated cells. This study aimed to conduct a thorough examination to assess how media choice influences respiratory cilia motility. To accomplish this, Adult C57/BL6 mouse trachea samples were incubated in eight commonly used liquid media including: Saline, Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS), Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), Medium 199 (M199), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (RPMI), Minimum Essential Medium (MEM), and Leibovitz's L-15 Medium (L-15); with or without 10% FBS supplementation. The effects of storage time (0-12 hours) and storage temperature (4 °C or room temperature) were also assessed. All media except saline were found to be equally effective in maintaining cilia function in airway samples that were freshly harvested and immediately imaged. Saline, however, significantly reduced the number of cells with motile cilia. A more complex pattern emerged when samples were stored before imaging. In saline, cilia function was significantly impaired after just one hour of storage. Samples stored in all other media showed strong maintenance of motile cilia function, with only minor changes. Notably, cilia function was better preserved with storage at 4 °C, while room temperature storage generally led to significant increases in CBF, especially in media containing FBS. Lastly, FBS supplementation was essential for maintaining cilia motility in L-15 media, as L-15 without FBS resulted in significant decreases in cilia motility following storage at either 4 °C or room temperature. In conclusion, saline should only be used if cilia are to be imaged immediately, as cilia stored in saline quickly lose motile function. All other commonly used media appear equally capable of maintaining motile cilia function for up to 12 hours when stored at 4 °C. Surprisingly, DPBS was just as effective as more expensive media in preserving ciliated samples. Storing ciliated tissue at room temperature generally leads to increased CBF, particularly in media containing FBS. Finally, L-15 media alone specifically requires the addition of 10% FBS to maintain cilia motility. These findings provide a valuable foundation for standardizing the handling, collection, and transport of ciliated samples for motile cilia assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.