Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161322›Full record

ArticleBiofilm2025

Transcriptional signatures associated with the survival of

Heema Kumari Nilesh Vyas, M Mozammel Hoque, Binbin Xia, David Alam, Patrick J Cullen, Scott A Rice, Anne Mai-Prochnow

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biofilm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Bactericidal: Plasma Surface Engineering to Defeat Food Matrix-Conditioning Layers.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  2. Biofilm sensitization to breakJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plasma-Activated Water Against Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Understanding mechanisms ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heema Kumari Nilesh VyasSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
M Mozammel HoqueAustralian Institute for Microbiology & Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Binbin XiaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David AlamSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick J CullenSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Scott A RiceAustralian Institute for Microbiology & Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne Mai-ProchnowSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation on surfaces, tools and equipment can damage their quality and lead to high repair or replacement costs. Plasma-activated water (PAW), a new technology, has shown promise in killing biofilm and non-biofilm bacteria due to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), particularly superoxide. However, the exact genetic mechanisms behind PAW's effectiveness against biofilms remain unclear. Here, we examined the stress responses of

Indexed as

BiofilmEscherichia coliPlasma-activated waterSteel surfacesTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40161322
PMCPMC11952861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.