ReviewEuropean heart journal open2025
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with atrial fibrillation: a narrative review.
Review in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of cardiac rehabilitation exercises incorporating music movement therapy on atrial fibrillation patients: a forward-looking investigation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Trial
- Atrial Fibrillation Modifies the Relationship Between Beta Blocker Dose and Physical Capacity After Myocardial Infarction.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Impact of patient phenotype on the relationship between accelerometer-derived physical activity and cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Lifes essential 8 score and 10-year cardiovascular outcomes in atrial fibrillation: A UK biobank analysis with simulated lifestyle improvement.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Atrial fibrillation: from pathogenesis to novel treatment options.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of physical activity (i.e. any bodily movement that requires energy expenditure) and exercise (i.e. planned, structured, and repetitive physical activity to improve/maintain fitness) in the primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly recognized. Physical activity has been associated with lower risks to develop AF and associated complications (e.g. stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) is increasingly examined in the treatment of AF and sometimes combined with rhythm control strategies (e.g. catheter ablation). Nonetheless, several important clinical, practical, and mechanistic questions remain not fully understood. This state-of-the-art review first provides a contemporary update on the evidence base for the clinical effects of ExCR in AF. Despite the ongoing need for high-quality studies, existing randomized controlled trials and cohort studies suggest ExCR reduces AF burden, lowers risks for major adverse cardiovascular events, and improves health-related quality of life. Second, to facilitate implementation of ExCR, we have observed comparable effects of distinct exercise protocols (e.g. type of training and centre-/home-based) and discussed similarity of effectiveness across patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex, and AF subtype). Critically, we have discussed potential barriers that may prohibit the uptake of ExCR for patients with AF, categorized at clinician- (e.g. referral and training), patient- (e.g. motivation, transportation, and psychosocial factors), and system-levels (e.g. insurance and resources). Third, we have summarized the potential mechanisms underlying these effects of ExCR, classified by their potential role in reducing AF burden (e.g. atrial/ventricular function, autonomic balance, and inflammation) and lowering risks for adverse events (e.g. modifiable risk factors, vascular function, and thrombogenesis). Based on the increasing evidence for clinical benefits, e.g. improved health-related quality of life and better clinical outcomes, we advocate stronger focus on regular physical activity and referral to multidisciplinary ExCR for sustainable lifestyle changes within the ESC AF-CARE pathway for the prevention and treatment of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.