ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Chest compression synchronized ventilation during prolonged experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves oxygenation but may cause pneumothoraces.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chest compression synchronized ventilation versus chest compression asynchronized ventilation in asphyxiated pediatric piglets-a randomized animal trial.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with synchronized ventilation versus 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio in a neonatal porcine model.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Chest compression synchronized ventilation versus chest compression superimposed by sustained inflation in asphyxiated newborn piglets: a randomized animal trial.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- The use of supplemental oxygen during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a systematic review of the literature.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Comparison of different airway pressures in (synchronized) ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Continuous Compressions, Incomplete Ventilation? A Retrospective Analysis of mCPR in Admitted ED Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Aerosol Generation Between Bag Valve and Chest Compression-Synchronized Ventilation During Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chest compression synchronized ventilation (CCSV) has been proposed to provide superior ventilation and haemodynamics during cardiac arrest (CA) compared to conventional asynchronous ventilation and compressions. We compared arterial gas exchange, pH, lactate levels and haemodynamics between CCSV and manual asynchronous ventilation during prolonged experimental CA. Methods: We randomized 30 pigs (weight ca. 55 kg) to receive CCSV with a MEDUMAT Standard Results: The median intra-arrest arterial blood gas results for CCSV were PaO Conclusions: The CCSV protocol resulted in higher arterial oxygenation but more pneumothoraces.The study was approved by the Finnish National Animal Experiment Board (ESAVI-26974-2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.