ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Characteristics, diagnostic accuracy, and safety in patients receiving selective prehospital thrombolysis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morning peak and high prevalence of pulmonary embolism and psychiatric disorders in women with sudden cardiac arrest: results from the ReCaPTa study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Prehospital thrombolysis with tenecteplase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) carries a significant mortality implication despite optimal conventional therapies. To better understand the role of prehospital thrombolysis for OOHCA, we report the clinical outcomes, safety and enhanced care team diagnostic accuracy concerning selective thrombolysis by a physician-paramedic staffed air ambulance service. Methods: A retrospective database review of electronic documentation was undertaken for all cases where thrombolysis was administered in OOHCA between January 2017 to April 2022 at Essex and Hertfordshire Air Ambulance Trust (EHAAT). Data collected included demographics, timings, pertinent clinical features, outcomes, and the treating team's suspected cause of arrest. For patients who died, cause of death was obtained from local coroners. Results: 100 patients were identified and five survived to hospital discharge. The median (IQR) time from first cardiac arrest to thrombolysis was 58.5 min (44-75). The cause of death was available for 60 patients, among these 43% had suffered either a pulmonary embolus (PE) or myocardial infarction (MI). In patients who died of MI the critical care team correctly diagnosed this in 76.9% of cases, and of those who died of PE 92.3% were correctly diagnosed. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of clinician diagnosis overall was only 36.7%. Conclusion: Despite a high proportion of patients having a cause of OOHCA theoretically amenable to thrombolysis, survival to hospital discharge remains poor. Further work is required to better understand the future role and timing of prehospital thrombolysis in refractory OOHCA. Clinicians detected both MI and PE with high sensitivity but low PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.