ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Seizures in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a disease of the cerebral vasculature that can result in microhemorrhages, as well as intraparenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhage, superficial siderosis (SS), and/or secondary infarct/inflammation. CAA may be encountered as an isolated pathology or with Alzheimer disease and has been demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of seizures. However, the overall rates of seizures and specific pathologies related to CAA and their subsequent risk of seizures have not been elucidated. Recent findings: Prior studies of CAA and seizures are predominantly case reports or small case series, and larger studies have focused primarily on smaller subgroups of patients with CAA. Only 2 prior studies assessed larger heterogeneous populations of patients with CAA. One study focused on long-term outcomes and evaluated the impact of seizures on cognitive and survival outcomes retrospectively, although it did not delineate the effects of acute and chronic seizure disorders (epilepsy) and did not find an association. Long-term prospective or retrospective studies on outcomes regarding seizures/epilepsy and CAA are therefore lacking. Summary: A total of 1,376 articles were identified, with 48 (34 case reports/series and 14 cohort studies) included in this review. Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) and epilepsy were poorly defined, and the overall prevalence of seizures in cohort studies was 22.8%, with significant heterogeneity (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.