ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2025
A Brief Introductory Guide to Nanoindentation for Comparative and Evolutionary Biologists, with a Case Study of Bone Material Property Diversity across Artiodactyl Skulls.
Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying the material properties of hard biological materials can improve understanding of the relationships between form, function, and performance. This study illustrates the use of nanoindentation as a tool for evaluating material properties in a comparative biology framework. We provide a step-by-step guide for comparative and evolutionary biologists illustrating the collection and analysis of nanoindentation data from samples of artiodactyl skull bones. We assess the impact of methodological decisions on the output of nanoindentation tests. We also investigate whether evolutionary variations in skull bone properties are present between artiodactyl species that engage in intraspecific head-to-head combat and those that do not. Elastic modulus exhibited little variation among numbers of indents performed per test and per bone sample. The average elastic modulus was significantly lower when bones were hydrated with deionized water. The skulls of artiodactyls exhibited a gradient of elastic modulus values in which the anterior of the skull is less stiff than more posterior locations. Species involved in head-to-head combat showed little difference in elastic modulus values compared to non-combat species. This suggests that ecological factors influence the evolutionary diversity of bone material properties, rather than strictly phylogenetic constraints. In a phylogenetic context, nanoindentation reveals tetrapod bone heterogeneity and provides insights into the evolution of these traits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.