Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161244›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2025

Brazilian Amazonian microorganisms: A sustainable alternative for plant development.

Monyck Jeane Dos Santos Lopes, Aline Figueiredo Cardoso, Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho, Ely Simone Cajueiro Gurgel, Gisele Barata da Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monyck Jeane Dos Santos LopesCoordination of Botany, Biotechnology Laboratory of Propagules and Seedlings, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Pará, Brazil.
Aline Figueiredo CardosoInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Brazil.
Moacyr Bernardino Dias-FilhoBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Pará, Brazil.
Ely Simone Cajueiro GurgelCoordination of Botany, Biotechnology Laboratory of Propagules and Seedlings, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Pará, Brazil.
Gisele Barata da SilvaFederal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Belém, PA, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) are a sustainable and promising alternative to enhance agricultural production. The Brazilian Amazon, and its mostly unexplored biodiversity, have great potential for identifying and isolating beneficial microorganisms to develop sustainable protocols for plant production with less environmental damage and to meet the increasing demand for food production. Thus, this study aimed to synthesize the findings over the last decade on microorganisms from the Amazon biome that promote plant growth while also addressing the challenges and prospects of this biotechnology. Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and fungi native to the Amazon have been shown to enhance the development of various crops, spanning agriculture and forestry, including palm cultivation and forage crops. The potential of PGPM in the Brazilian Amazon discussed throughout this review highlights the importance of further research in this region. Amazon PGPM is promising for use in the inoculant industry, which would contribute to the agricultural production of diverse crops, reduce costs, minimize the use of chemical inputs, mitigate adverse environmental impacts, and support the conservation of the Amazon biome. Furthermore, the advancement of knowledge in this region holds a great potential, thus offering access to different strains for the formulation of new inoculants that can, in a more sustainable manner, enhance the productivity of various crops, thereby promoting global food security.

Indexed as

Amazon biomeinoculantsplant growth-promoting bacteriasustainability

Identifiers

PMID40161244
PMCPMC11950687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.