Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161224›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

EMSAM: enhanced multi-scale segment anything model for leaf disease segmentation.

Junlong Li, Quan Feng, Jianhua Zhang, Sen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junlong LiSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Quan FengSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Jianhua ZhangAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sen YangSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of leaf diseases is crucial for crop health management and disease prevention. However, existing studies fall short in addressing issues such as blurred disease spot boundaries and complex feature distributions in disease images. Although the vision foundation model, Segment Anything Model (SAM), performs well in general segmentation tasks within natural scenes, it does not exhibit good performance in plant disease segmentation. To achieve fine-grained segmentation of leaf disease images, this study proposes an advanced model: Enhanced Multi-Scale SAM (EMSAM). EMSAM employs the Local Feature Extraction Module (LFEM) and the Global Feature Extraction Module (GFEM) to extract local and global features from images respectively. The LFEM utilizes multiple convolutional layers to capture lesion boundaries and detailed characteristics, while the GFEM fine-tunes ViT blocks using a Multi-Scale Adaptive Adapter (MAA) to obtain multi-scale global information. Both outputs of LFEM and GFEM are then effectively fused in the Feature Fusion Module (FFM), which is optimized with cross-branch and channel attention mechanisms, significantly enhancing the model's ability to handle blurred boundaries and complex shapes. EMSAM integrates lightweight linear layers as classification heads and employs a joint loss function for both classification and segmentation tasks. Experimental results on the PlantVillage dataset demonstrate that EMSAM outperforms the second-best state-of-the-art semantic segmentation model by 2.45% in Dice Coefficient and 6.91% in IoU score, and surpasses the baseline method by 21.40% and 22.57%, respectively. Particularly, for images with moderate and severe disease levels, EMSAM achieved Dice Coefficients of 0.8354 and 0.8178, respectively, significantly outperforming other semantic segmentation algorithms. Additionally, the model achieved a classification accuracy of 87.86% across the entire dataset, highlighting EMSAM's effectiveness and superiority in plant disease segmentation and classification tasks.

Indexed as

adapter tuningleaf disease segmentationmulti-task learningparameter efficient fine-tuningsegment anything model

Identifiers

PMID40161224
PMCPMC11949962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.