Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161217›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Unravelling pathological ageing with brain age gap estimation in Alzheimer's disease, diabetes and schizophrenia.

Maria Fátima Dias, João Valente Duarte, Paulo de Carvalho, Miguel Castelo-Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Association of imaging-defined brain age with disease severity and adverse outcomes in CADASIL.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Fátima DiasCIBIT (Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research), ICNAS, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
João Valente DuarteCIBIT (Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research), ICNAS, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8586-9554
Paulo de CarvalhoCISUC/LASI - Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoCIBIT (Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research), ICNAS, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-6373

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP004950NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE), the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age, might be a putative biomarker aiming to detect the transition from healthy to pathological brain ageing. The biomarker primarily models healthy ageing with machine learning models trained with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. BrainAGE is expected to translate the deviations in neural ageing trajectory and has been shown to be increased in multiple pathologies, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia and Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Thus, accelerated ageing seems to be a general feature of neuropathological processes. However, neurobiological constraints remain to be identified to provide specificity to this biomarker. Explainability might be the key to uncovering age predictions and understanding which brain regions lead to an elevated predicted age on a given pathology compared to healthy controls. This is highly relevant to understanding the similarities and differences in neurodegeneration in AD and T2D, which remains an outstanding biological question. Sensitivity maps explain models by computing the importance of each voxel on the final prediction, thereby contributing to the interpretability of deep learning approaches. This paper assesses whether sensitivity maps yield different results across three conditions related to pathological neural ageing: AD, schizophrenia and T2D. Five deep learning models were considered, each model trained with different MRI data types: minimally processed T

Indexed as

brain age gapdeep learningexplainabilityneuropsychiatric disorders

Identifiers

PMID40161217
PMCPMC11950532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.