Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161173›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

How Important Is Vitamin D Supplementation in the Prevention of Exacerbations in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): An Evidence-Based Review.

Ludovina Rocha, Beatriz Figueiredo, Sara Eduarda Martins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ludovina RochaGeneral and Family Medicine, Unidade de Saúde Familiar (USF) São Neutel, Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (ULSTMAD), Chaves, PRT.
Beatriz FigueiredoGeneral and Family Medicine, Unidade de Saúde Familiar (USF) São Neutel, Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (ULSTMAD), Chaves, PRT.
Sara Eduarda MartinsGeneral and Family Medicine, Unidade de Saúde Familiar (USF) São Neutel, Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (ULSTMAD), Chaves, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in preventing exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a major global contributor to morbidity and mortality. Exacerbations, often caused by infections, significantly worsen outcomes and elevate healthcare costs. Given its immunomodulatory properties, vitamin D has been hypothesized to reduce exacerbations, particularly in populations with vitamin D deficiency. A systematic search of multiple databases was performed in February 2024 and evidence was synthesized from four systematic reviews with meta-analyses and one recent randomized controlled trial. Findings indicate that vitamin D supplementation does not generally reduce exacerbation rates in COPD patients. However, in patients with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum levels below 10 ng/mL, one meta-analysis reported a significant (p=0.006) reduction in moderate-to-severe exacerbations following supplementation. Variability in study designs, dosages, and follow-up durations limit the generalizability of these findings. Nevertheless, clinical guidelines recommend screening and supplementing vitamin D in COPD patients, particularly those with severe deficiency. Clinicians should consider the low cost and risk of vitamin D supplementation and its potential benefits in reducing exacerbations in such patients.

Indexed as

copdexacerbationpreventionsupplementationvitamin d

Identifiers

PMID40161173
PMCPMC11954655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.