ReviewCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Aortic Aneurysms.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Review
- The Next Frontiers in Preventive and Personalized Healthcare: Artificial Intelligent-powered Solutions.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Predictive modeling for metastasis in oncology: current methods and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Modeling Techniques and Boundary Conditions in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Analysis: Latest Developments in Simulation and Integration of Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI-driven decision making for intravascular device selection in aortic disease. Current insights and prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a major concern to the global society because of the associated risk of rupture and death. Currently, the management of AAAs entails clinical and imaging risk factors, which are not precise and accurate in terms of patient-specific risk assessment. Over the last decade, the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms has transformed the process of decision-making in the field of medicine by allowing for the creation of personalized models based on the patient's characteristics. This review aims to discuss the current state and future directions of AI in the form of predictive modeling for aortic aneurysms, stressing the versatility and progression of the ML approaches in risk assessment, screening, and prognosis. We expand on the various strategies used in AI-based solutions and the differences between general and specific approaches such as supervised and unsupervised learning, deep learning, and others. Furthermore, we bring forward the problem of incorporating clinical, imaging, and genomic data into AI/ML to improve its predictiveness and applicability to clinical practice. In addition, we discuss the difficulties and prospects of turning the developed AI-based forecasting models into clinical practice, as well as the problems associated with data quality, model explainability, and legal and ethical concerns. This review aims to reveal the opportunities of AI and ML in enhancing the risk assessment and management of AAAs to shift the paradigm of cardiovascular care toward precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.