Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161143›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessing the Role of Ultrasound Scanning in Improving Pregnancy Outcomes in Potiskum and Neighboring Rural Communities in Yobe State, Nigeria.

Olajide J Olagunju, Ben Egbo, Olagoke O Osanyinlusi, Olayinka E Olagunju, Seyi E Olorunmolu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olajide J OlagunjuDivision of Infectious Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
Ben EgboDepartment of Radiology, Potiskum Medical Center, Potiskum, NGA.
Olagoke O OsanyinlusiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Olayinka E OlagunjuDepartment of Zoology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, NGA.
Seyi E OlorunmoluDepartment of Anatomy, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Accurate pregnancy dating is vital for timely prenatal interventions that reduce maternal and neonatal risks. In underserved areas such as Potiskum, Yobe State, Nigeria, limited awareness, poor healthcare access, and cultural barriers hinder early pregnancy detection, gestational age estimation, and monitoring. While ultrasound, the gold standard for dating pregnancies, could address these challenges, its impact in these regions remains underexplored. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed five years of data (2019-2023) from the electronic health records (EHRs) of Potiskum Medical Center. The study included 15,862 records of women who resided within a 20-km radius of Potiskum and underwent ultrasound scanning during pregnancy. Descriptive statistics were carried out to understand the characteristics of the study population, and logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between pregnancy outcomes and factors including ultrasound scan frequency, maternal age, educational attainment, socioeconomic status, parity, and marital status. Results The study revealed that women who underwent a first-trimester ultrasound with one or two additional scans had significantly higher odds of improved pregnancy outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-2.46, and AOR = 3.84, 95% CI = 0.34-0.58, respectively, p < 0.0001). In contrast, third-trimester-only scans had lower odds of favorable outcomes (AOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.52, p = 0.001). Maternal age was also a significant factor, with younger women (21-30 years) demonstrating the highest odds of favorable outcomes (AOR = 4.24, 95% CI = 0.28-0.86, p < 0.001). Higher educational attainment and socioeconomic status were positively associated with improved outcomes, with tertiary education (AOR = 2.84, 95% CI = 2.96-3.47, p = 0.001) and high income (AOR = 3.84, 95% CI = 3.23-4.06, p < 0.0001) showing the strongest effects. Moderate parity was also associated with better outcomes, while high parity showed weaker odds (AOR = 0.65, 95% CI = 1.28-2.86, p < 0.0001). Conclusion The findings highlight the transformative potential of early and all-trimester ultrasound use in improving pregnancy outcomes in rural communities. Factors such as maternal age, education, socioeconomic status, and parity significantly influence outcomes, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable access to quality antenatal care. Addressing these gaps can improve pregnancy outcomes, contributing to global efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to explore barriers to ultrasound access and develop strategies to enhance antenatal care utilization in underserved regions.

Indexed as

antenatal care visitsnortheastern nigeriapregnancy outcomerole of ultrasound imagingrural and underserved communities

Identifiers

PMID40161143
PMCPMC11954567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.