ArticleCureus2025
Reduction Scrotoplasty With Concomitant Ventral Phalloplasty: Rethinking the Approach to a Common Urological Condition.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scrotal reduction surgery with concomitant ventral phalloplasty is a procedure designed to address increased scrotal laxity and penoscrotal webbing (PSW), conditions that can significantly impact genital aesthetics, patient comfort, and sexual satisfaction. In this case report, we present a 44-year-old man who developed persistent scrotal enlargement and PSW following bilateral hydrocelectomy. The patient experienced discomfort during daily activities and intercourse, along with a perception of decreased penile length. To achieve a more comprehensive correction, we utilized a novel modification of the transverse check mark-shaped incision, designed to address both scrotal laxity and PSW in a single-stage procedure. Unlike previous techniques that primarily focus on webbing excision, our approach incorporated additional modifications to optimize scrotal contouring and prevent residual laxity. This technique effectively resolved redundant scrotal tissue while optimizing both functional and cosmetic outcomes. The patient recovered without complications and reported significant improvement in scrotal contour and perceived penile length. As more cases of scrotal laxity are identified following urological procedures, surgeons and urologists should be aware of refined surgical techniques that can enhance patient satisfaction and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.