ArticleCureus2025
The Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics Tool for the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking effective decision-making and critical thinking in orthopaedics: Insights from a narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Updating practices can be challenging in evidence-based practice when integrating the evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and preferences. Implementing evidence-based practice requires individual, collective, and organizational behavioral changes. Effective behavior change interventions are necessary to facilitate the implementation of new evidence. We propose a tool to facilitate the implementation of evidence in clinical decision-making by changing healthcare providers' behaviors. Methods The Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (CEBO) tool was developed to bridge the gap between evidence and practice in a hospital department. The development process follows a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) structure and is based on the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which recognize that effective behavior change necessitates addressing factors at both individual and organizational levels. The CEBO tool consists of four phases, guiding the process from identifying an evidence-practice gap to evaluating behavioral changes following implementation. Results We applied the CEBO tool to two surgical cases, which led to substantial behavioral changes in orthopedic surgeons' treatment choices. Our findings indicate that the CEBO tool is feasible and can influence surgeons' behaviors to align more closely with the best available evidence. Conclusion The CEBO tool helps align practice with the best available evidence. Although implementing new practices effectively is time-consuming, it seems achievable with the CEBO tool. Substantial behavioral changes were observed among surgeons in both cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.