ReviewCureus2025
Comparing Medical and Surgical Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review of Dupilumab and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dupilumab Extended Interval Dosing in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Dosing Interval Extension of Dupilumab in CRSwNP: Five-Year Real World Outcomes.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- Advance in biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a multifactorial condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life through persistent nasal obstruction, loss of smell, and facial pain. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has historically been the definitive option for patients who fail first-line therapies, yet emerging evidence suggests that Dupixent (dupilumab), an IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor, may provide robust medical management by directly targeting the underlying type 2 inflammatory pathways. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, examining randomized clinical trials and prospective intervention studies identified through multiple databases. Findings indicate that both ESS and Dupixent can substantially improve symptoms and overall quality of life in patients with CRS. Surgical intervention offers rapid anatomical relief of nasal obstruction and may reduce bacterial biofilm prevalence, but improvements in olfactory outcomes are often limited, especially in non-polyp patients. Meanwhile, Dupixent consistently demonstrated significant reductions in nasal polyp burden, SNOT-22 scores, and enhanced olfactory function, particularly in those with pronounced type 2 inflammation. However, questions remain regarding its long-term safety, tolerability, and financial feasibility, given its ongoing nature and high cost. This review underscores the complementary roles of medical and surgical therapies: Dupixent addresses the inflammatory aspect of CRS, while ESS corrects anatomical blockages and improves local medication delivery. Ultimately, patient-specific factors-including comorbid conditions, severity of polyposis, response to first-line therapies, and cost considerations-should guide treatment selection. Ongoing large-scale trials and head-to-head comparisons will be pivotal in deciding optimal management strategies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and refining personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.