ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating the Impact of a Good Clinical Practice Workshop on the Knowledge and Attitude of Postgraduate Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the gap in clinical research training: a qualitative study of postgraduate medical students' perceptions of good clinical practice education.Medical education online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Good clinical practice (GCP) is critical for the safety of participants and the quality of data generated during clinical studies. A GCP workshop can enhance the knowledge and attitude of postgraduate medical students towards GCP. Thus, a study was needed to assess the impact of such a workshop. This study aims to assess the impact of such a workshop on GCP for postgraduate medical students. Methodology A GCP workshop was organized for postgraduate medical students. We evaluated the workshop's effectiveness using the Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation. We collected the participant's knowledge and attitude using pre- and post-tests, questionnaires, and their feedback. We applied the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test to the collected data. Results A total of 79 postgraduate students from different academic years participated in the workshop. The Shapiro-Wilk test, z-test, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, with p-values < 0.05, clearly outlined the positive impact of the workshop on the participant's knowledge and attitude. Box plots for pre- and post-test responses for knowledge and attitude reinforced this finding. The feedback identified the need for more interactive and case-based workshop delivery. Conclusion This study clearly outlines the positive impact of conducting a workshop on GCP for postgraduate medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.