ReviewCureus2025
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjuvant Interventions in Levofloxacin-Exposed Rabbit Achilles Tendons: An Exploratory Controlled Pilot Study with Histopathological and Ultrasonographic Endpoints.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: An Umbrella Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Challenges of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: From Standardized Preparation to Multi-Omics-Guided Precision Therapy.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is a debilitating condition that significantly affects mobility and quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has been proposed as a treatment option, leveraging growth factors to promote tendon healing, but its effectiveness remains unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP in reducing pain, improving function, and facilitating recovery in chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A total of 13 studies involving 697 patients were analyzed. Key outcomes included pain reduction (measured by visual analog scale {VAS}), functional improvement (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles {VISA-A}), return to activity, and patient satisfaction. Study variability was analyzed using heterogeneity measures. PRP demonstrated significant pain reduction (pooled mean VAS: 71.24, 95% CI: 53.06-89.42). Functional improvement was observed (VISA-A scores: 35.10-86.80). On average, 85% of patients returned to activity (95% CI: 65-98%) and 72% reported satisfaction (95% CI: 51-88%). High heterogeneity (I²=97%) was noted, likely due to variability in PRP preparation and treatment protocols. PRP offers promise as a treatment for chronic Achilles tendinopathy, with evidence of pain relief and functional improvement. However, variability in outcomes emphasizes the need for standardized approaches to its use and further research to better define its role in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.