Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161081›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Digital X-ray Tomography in the Clinical Diagnosis of Suspected Neck of Femur Fractures.

Adam Esa, Adnan Hussain, Fatuma Nageye, Namir Al-Mokhtar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam EsaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, GBR.
Adnan HussainTrauma and Orthopaedics, Neville Hall Hospital, Abergavenny, GBR.
Fatuma NageyeHospital-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, GBR.
Namir Al-MokhtarRadiology, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Occult fracture of the neck of femur (NOF) is a challenging acute presentation for orthopaedic surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the use of digital tomography in the diagnosis of occult NOF fractures not visible on plain radiographs. Materials and methods A total of 100 patients admitted with suspected NOF fractures but negative plain X-rays underwent digital tomography studies. In equivocal tomography studies, patients who are clinically moderate to high probability suspicious of a hip fracture underwent further MRI or CT scans. Result In this study, 100 patients with suspected NOF fractures underwent a digital tomography investigation. The tomography identified 43 patients with fractures, including 18 with NOF, and therefore, they were surgically treated. In addition, 14 additional patients had other pelvic fractures and were treated conservatively. Eleven patients with suspicious fractures identified on tomography underwent MRI/CT to delineate the fracture pattern. From this subgroup, two patients were found to have fracture extension to NOF. Moreover, eight patients underwent tomography but were inconclusive and underwent MRI/CT, which identified five NOF fractures. A total of 37 patients with a negative tomogram for fracture NOF and a low clinical probability of a fracture did not undergo additional MRI/CT scanning. At 12 months of follow-up, this group had no readmissions due to complications related to their initial injury. Conclusion Tomography is a novel imaging modality that can be used to diagnose NOF and other pelvic fractures. This is a promising imaging modality, especially in patients not suitable to undergo MRI/CT. It offers a cost-effective and accurate alternative, making it an effective tool for managing patients in economically disadvantaged regions, as it is relatively easier to interpret.

Indexed as

digital tomo-synthesiship and proximal femur traumaneck of femur fracturesoccult fracturex-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID40161081
PMCPMC11954429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.