ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Autonomy support in telehealth: an evolutionary concept analysis.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Game theoretic research on strategies for medical carbon neutrality stakeholders under time delay effects.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Both sides of the screen: A dual-sided model of telemedicine adoption through extended UTAUT2.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Autonomy support plays a critical role in safeguarding patients' fundamental rights and promoting health behaviors. The context of autonomy support is transitioning from traditional face-to-face healthcare settings to telehealth, leading to an evolution in the connotation of autonomy support. This study aimed to clarify the connotation of autonomy support in telehealth and to develop a conceptual framework to guide innovations in clinical practice and the advancement of related theories. Methods: Rodgers' evolutionary method was used to clarified attributes, antecedents, and consequences of autonomy support in telehealth. The integrative review strategy of Whittemore and Knafl was used as the methodology for searching relevant literature. Results: Twenty-five articles were included. The attributes were identified as: (i) technical feedback; (ii) virtual agent; (iii) choice; (iv) rationale; (v) empathy; (vi) collaboration; and (vii) strengths. The antecedents were: (i) telehealth service system; (ii) change in awareness toward autonomy support; and (iii) patient preference of needs for autonomy. The consequences were: (i) multidimensional perception; (ii) emotional experience; (iii) health behavior; (iv) social relation; and (v) technological dependence. Conclusion: This study clarified the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of autonomy support in telehealth, developing and improving a conceptual framework for autonomy support. These findings will provide a theoretical foundation for developing technology-enabled autonomy support strategies in telehealth practice, better adapting to the emerging needs of patients in the context of the digital age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.