ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2025
How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-year survival and failure patterns of complete arch fixed implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses: A retrospective analysis of 3300 laboratory cases.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Multifactorial Evaluation of Color Changes in Material Assemblies Used for Hybrid Abutment Crowns: Role of Ceramics, Surface Treatments, and Resin Cements.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Two-Phase Material Shape Optimization of an Additively Manufactured Integrated Metal and Ceramic Resin Implant-Supported Dental Crown.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital technologies and the introduction of new ceramic materials have largely attributed to the notable transition from metal-ceramic to all-ceramic implant restorations bonded to Ti-bases. The purpose of this review was to evaluate all clinical studies reporting on the bond stability between CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations and Ti-bases. The review was directed according to the PRISMA guidelines to answer the focused question "How much is the stability and durability of the resin bond between implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations and Ti- bases clinically?". The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were investigated to identify related clinical studies. Human studies assessing at least 10 patients restored with implant-supported fixed CAD-CAM ceramic restorations luted to prefabricated Ti-bases with a mean follow-up of at least 1 year and published in an English-language up to Sep. 2024 were included. The restorations could be single crown, fixed dental prosthesis, or full-arch fixed prosthesis. The search yielded 5,190 records; of these, 59 full-text articles were evaluated based on eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 40 studies were included. All 40 studies demonstrated low debonding rates from Ti-bases for single copings, multi-unit fixed dental prostheses, and full arch zirconia prostheses. Based on the limited evidence available, different factors were blamed for the debonding incidence, such as Ti-base height, geometry, luting agent, inadequacy of passive fit and biomechanical patient- and prosthesis-related factors. CAD-CAM implant-supported all-ceramic restorations bonded to Ti-bases demonstrated relatively high bond stability during observation period ranging from 1 to 7.5 years. More well-designed clinical research with long-term observation periods is highly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.