ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025
Flow cytometric procedures for deep characterization of nanoparticles.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprocess Design and Optimization of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles: Bioengineering principles, quality control, and translational opportunities.APL bioengineering · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Small Size Vesicles for the Treatment of Liver Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Characterization of nanoplastics and small-sized microplastics in sewage treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a notable increasing interest surrounding the identification and quantification of nano-sized particles, including extracellular vesicles (EVs) and viruses. The challenge posed by the nano-sized dimension of these particles makes precise examination a significant undertaking. Among the different techniques for the accurate study of EVs, flow cytometry stands out as the ideal method. It is characterized by high sensitivity, low time consumption, non-destructive sampling, and high throughput. In this article, we propose the optimization of flow cytometry procedures to identify, quantify, and purify EVs and virus-like particles. The protocol aims to reduce artefacts and errors in nano-sized particles counting, overall caused by the swarming effect. Different threshold strategies were compared to ensure result specificity. Additionally, the critical parameters to consider when using conventional flow cytometry outside of the common experimental context of use have also been identified. Finally, fluorescent-EVs sorting protocol was also developed with highly reliable results using a conventional cell sorter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.