ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2025
Surrogate data analyses of the energy landscape analysis of resting-state brain activity.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automating region selection with genetic algorithms for energy landscape analyses of brain dynamics.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- System identification and surrogate data analyses imply approximate Gaussianity and non-stationarity of resting-brain dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Resting-state fMRI analysis of functional connectivity and temporal dynamics differences between cocaine users and healthy controls.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- From microstates to macroscales: A Critical Review of Maximum Entropy Modeling and Energy Landscape Analysis in functional MRI.Research square · 2025Article
- Analyzing the brain's dynamic response to targeted stimulation using generative modeling.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Energy landscape analysis based on the Ising model: Tutorial review.PLOS complex systems · 2025Article
- Extracting interpretable signatures of whole-brain dynamics through systematic comparison.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Extracting interpretable signatures of whole-brain dynamics through systematic comparison.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatiotemporal dynamics of resting-state brain activity can be characterized by switching between multiple brain states, and numerous techniques have been developed to extract such dynamic features from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. However, many of these techniques are based on momentary temporal correlation and co-activation patterns and merely reflect linear features of the data, suggesting that the dynamic features, such as state-switching, extracted by these techniques may be misinterpreted. To examine whether such misinterpretations occur when using techniques that are not based on momentary temporal correlation or co-activation patterns, we addressed Energy Landscape Analysis (ELA) based on pairwise-maximum entropy model (PMEM), a statistical physics-inspired method that was designed to extract multiple brain states and dynamics of resting-state fMRI data. We found that the shape of the energy landscape and the first-order transition probability derived from ELA were similar between real data and surrogate data suggesting that these features were largely accounted for by stationary and linear properties of the real data without requiring state-switching among locally stable states. To confirm that surrogate data were distinct from the real data, we replicated a previous finding that some topological properties of resting-state fMRI data differed between the real and surrogate data. Overall, we found that linear models largely reproduced the first order ELA-derived features (i.e., energy landscape and transition probability) with some notable differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.