Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160726›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Optimized Gradient Boosting Models for Adaptive Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Carbonate Rocks Using Drilling Data.

Stephen Adjei, Ahmed Gowida, Salaheldin Elkatatny, John Ojuu Oleka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen AdjeiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi 378466289, Ghana.
Ahmed GowidaDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Salaheldin ElkatatnyDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-3715
John Ojuu OlekaDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi 378466289, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is a critical geo-mechanical property used to assess the mechanical properties of subsurface formations. While the traditional laboratory tests for UCS estimation are accurate, they are time-consuming and costly. The advancements in machine learning offer a more efficient option for UCS prediction using real-time data. This work investigates the predictive ability of three types of Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs): Standard Gradient Boosting, Stochastic Gradient Boosting, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for UCS prediction. Unlike conventional machine learning approaches, which depend on static model inputs, lagging techniques were applied where drilling depth data from earlier depths were used as input features, allowing for dynamic model changes and enhanced prediction accuracy as new data is acquired in real time. The data set included 2056 drilling data points, comprising rate of penetration (ROP), mud pumping rate (GPM), standpipe pressure (SPP), rotary speed (RPM), torque (T), and weight on bit (WOB), with an unseen validation data set of 870 points. Hyperparameter optimization significantly improved the prediction performance with XGBoost achieving superior accuracy, shown by the lowest error metrics across the test and validation data set. This technique offers significant potential for improving real-time UCS predictions in carbonate formations, enhancing drilling efficiency while reducing risks such as wellbore instability.

Identifiers

PMID40160726
PMCPMC11948144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.