ArticleSurgery open science2025
"Impact of regional data reporting and feedback on rectal cancer surgery quality metrics in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP)".
Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of best practice meetings on clinical outcomes in surgical and oncological care: a scoping review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of rectal cancer is increasingly complex. Leading societies describe metrics of high-quality perioperative rectal cancer care with the goal of reducing variation in practice and improving outcomes. This study was designed to describe the impact of targeted feedback at the institutional level on improving achievement of rectal cancer quality metrics. Methods: Adult elective rectal cancer resections performed at institutions that continuously participated in SCOAP between 2011 and 2022 were included for analysis. Quality metrics evaluated were preoperative MRI (MRI), determination of tumor location (TL), use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NAC), performance of a total mesorectal excision (TME), 12+ lymph nodes resected (LN), and composite negative margins (NM). In-depth feedback on these metrics was provided by SCOAP at the end of 2015 and 2019. Achievement of the metrics was evaluated before (2011-2016), between (2017-2019), and after (2020-2022) feedback events to determine effect on achievement. Results: 1962 resections were performed at 19 institutions. There were statistically significant increases in MRI(2011-2016 = 32 %, 2017-2019 = 88 %, 2020-2022 = 92 %; Conclusion: Interval, in-depth feedback on rectal cancer quality process metrics was associated with increased achievement of several metrics and overall number of metrics achieved. Broader implementation of this feedback method could further advance the quality of rectal cancer surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.