Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160671›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Quantitative assessment and risk stratification of random acute pulmonary embolism cases using a deep learning model based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography images.

Yang Qiao, Yaozong Gao, Yanbo Chen, Xiaodan Ye, Cheng Yan, Mengsu Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang QiaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-2454
Yaozong GaoUnited Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Yanbo ChenUnited Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan YeDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng YanDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mengsu ZengDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). The semi-quantitative clot burden scoring based on imaging is related to the risk stratification and prognosis of acute PE, but it cannot be widely applied in the clinic due to the difficulty of calculation. This study developed a high-quality VB-Net deep learning (DL) model combined with Transformer, which can detect PE from images and automatically calculate the clot burden score (CBS). The aim of this study was to help patients via earlier diagnosis, risk stratification, and determination of treatment plans, thereby improving prognosis, as well as alleviate the burden on radiologists. To our knowledge, no related studies have been reported. Methods: A retrospective inclusion of 2,424 CTPA examination cases (44% male) were conducted to train and test the VB-Net DL model for the detection of PE and to evaluate the clot burden volume and scoring. Area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity on the case or clot level were used to evaluate the model's performance. Random CTPA data from Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (30 cases with acute PE, 40 cases without PE) were applied to test the relationship between the clot burden automatically calculated by the model and the Qanadli score determined manually, as well as other imaging parameters. Results: The performance of the VB-Net DL model on the testing set had an AUC of 0.972 based on the case level. The sensitivity at the operational point of the model threshold selected was 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8650-0.9828], and the specificity was 89.4% (95% CI: 0.8407-0.9308). In the random CTPA examinations from this research center, the model's sensitivity based on the case was 76.67% (95% CI: 0.5880-0.8848), the specificity was 95.00% (95% CI: 0.8261-0.9950), the positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.00%, and the accuracy was 87.14%. On the clot-based level, the sensitivity was 84.43%, the PPV was 87.29%, and the false positive rate was 0.19 per case. The clot burden volume and score automatically measured by the model were significantly correlated with the manually determined Qanadli score (r=0.866, P<0.001 and r=0.899, P<0.001, respectively). The severity grading of the CBS groups was consistent with the degree of right ventricular dilation. Conclusions: The VB-Net DL model based on CTPA could conveniently and efficiently detect and quantitatively evaluate PE.

Indexed as

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE)automatic clot burden score (automatic CBS)computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)deep learning model (DL model)

Identifiers

PMID40160671
PMCPMC11948401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.