ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Quantitative assessment and risk stratification of random acute pulmonary embolism cases using a deep learning model based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in computed tomography imaging for pulmonary embolism: a narrative review from computed tomography pulmonary angiography to non-contrast computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Commercial artificial intelligence-assisted performance and interpretation time of first-on-call radiology residents using computed tomography pulmonary angiography to detect pulmonary embolism: a multireader, multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- 3D region-growing nnU-Net improves pulmonary embolism detection on CTPA: a dual-cohort validation study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Developing a novel deep learning-based model for automatic right ventricular parameters assessment on ctpa in pulmonary embolism.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Identification of disease subtypes associated with prognosis in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism based on hierarchical cluster analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The Role of Early Rehabilitation in Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). The semi-quantitative clot burden scoring based on imaging is related to the risk stratification and prognosis of acute PE, but it cannot be widely applied in the clinic due to the difficulty of calculation. This study developed a high-quality VB-Net deep learning (DL) model combined with Transformer, which can detect PE from images and automatically calculate the clot burden score (CBS). The aim of this study was to help patients via earlier diagnosis, risk stratification, and determination of treatment plans, thereby improving prognosis, as well as alleviate the burden on radiologists. To our knowledge, no related studies have been reported. Methods: A retrospective inclusion of 2,424 CTPA examination cases (44% male) were conducted to train and test the VB-Net DL model for the detection of PE and to evaluate the clot burden volume and scoring. Area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity on the case or clot level were used to evaluate the model's performance. Random CTPA data from Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (30 cases with acute PE, 40 cases without PE) were applied to test the relationship between the clot burden automatically calculated by the model and the Qanadli score determined manually, as well as other imaging parameters. Results: The performance of the VB-Net DL model on the testing set had an AUC of 0.972 based on the case level. The sensitivity at the operational point of the model threshold selected was 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8650-0.9828], and the specificity was 89.4% (95% CI: 0.8407-0.9308). In the random CTPA examinations from this research center, the model's sensitivity based on the case was 76.67% (95% CI: 0.5880-0.8848), the specificity was 95.00% (95% CI: 0.8261-0.9950), the positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.00%, and the accuracy was 87.14%. On the clot-based level, the sensitivity was 84.43%, the PPV was 87.29%, and the false positive rate was 0.19 per case. The clot burden volume and score automatically measured by the model were significantly correlated with the manually determined Qanadli score (r=0.866, P<0.001 and r=0.899, P<0.001, respectively). The severity grading of the CBS groups was consistent with the degree of right ventricular dilation. Conclusions: The VB-Net DL model based on CTPA could conveniently and efficiently detect and quantitatively evaluate PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.