ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Dynamic chest radiography in post-lobectomy recovery: a novel approach to evaluating pulmonary function and thoracic structures in patients with primary lung cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lobectomy for lung cancer leads to changes in thoracic structures and reduced pulmonary function, but real-time evaluation of compensatory mechanisms has been challenging. This study employed dynamic chest radiography to examine post-lobectomy changes in the projected lung area and excursion of diaphragm, as evaluated by sequential chest radiography, and determine their correlation with pulmonary function recovery. Methods: This single-center and cross-sectional study was conducted at the Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital and included 65 patients who underwent lobectomy between May 2018 and December 2020. Dynamic chest radiography was performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively alongside standard pulmonary function tests. We evaluated the postoperative trends in pulmonary function, projected lung area, and excursion of diaphragm. The results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney Results: Significant correlations were observed between the maximum projected lung area and pulmonary function recovery, particularly in upper lobectomy cases (correlation with vital capacity at 1 month postoperatively: r=0.72, P<0.01). This correlation was observed consistently across various surgical procedures, which suggests that early postoperative projected lung area measurements can predict pulmonary function recovery at 12 months. Excursion of diaphragm, especially in upper lobectomy cases, also showed a positive correlation with pulmonary function recovery (correlation with vital capacity at 1 month postoperatively: r=0.55, P<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis validated the predictive capability of early postoperative projected lung area for long-term pulmonary function recovery with area under the curve of 0.815 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.636-0.994] for upper lobectomy and 0.798 (95% CI: 0.564-0.982) for lower lobectomy groups. Conclusions: Dynamic chest radiography, which assessed the projected lung area and excursion of diaphragm, emerged as a promising non-invasive tool for monitoring post-lobectomy recovery and guiding rehabilitation efforts. These findings indicate its potential as an early predictor of pulmonary recovery, advocating for its integration into the perioperative care of patients with lung cancer. Future research should expand patient cohorts and refine predictive models using preoperative dynamic chest radiography to enhance post-lobectomy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.