ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Enhancing bone radiology images classification through appropriate preprocessing: a deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex estimation from hand-wrist radiographic images: an artificial intelligence approach.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical image classification has been an important application for deep learning techniques for over a decade, and since the emergence of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), researchers have started using XAI to validate the results produced by these black box models. In the research field, it has become clear that accuracy and efficiency are not the only crucial factors for developing medical deep learning models; the authenticity of results and the accountability of the model and its creator also matter greatly. The objective of this study is to emphasize the importance of authenticity of the results and the accountability of deep learning models used for medical purposes, through proposing targeted preprocessing method for medical dataset processed by deep learning models. Methods: In this paper we conduct comparison experiments on processing two bone radiology image datasets using various deep learning neural networks, while emphasizing on the effect of appropriate preprocessing methods for the dataset towards the models' prediction performance. Comparisons are conducted both horizontally, between performance of different neural networks; and vertically, of using same models processing datasets before and after going through appropriate preprocessing procedures. Furthermore, we evaluate the experimental results not only quantitatively, but also visually by using XAI techniques, in order to determine the reasonability and reliability of the predictions from the experiments. Results: Results showed that for the bone radiology image dataset used for our experiment, among the five comparison models, DenseNet201 achieved the highest validation accuracy of 78%. Using the same models to process the abovementioned dataset after conducting appropriate preprocessing procedures, performance for all models have increased by an average of 0.06. Using XAI technique to evaluate the comparison results for before/after preprocessing experiments, we could observe that the appropriate preprocessing method effectively helped the models to concentrate on the abnormality areas on the radiology images comparing to processing raw images. Conclusions: The novelty of this paper lies in its specific application of extended preprocessing techniques-namely, the removal of background and irrelevant parts-to medical images for improving the performance of deep learning models in classification tasks. While the concept of preprocessing images has been explored by many researchers, applying such targeted preprocessing steps to medical images, combined with the use of XAI to validate and illustrate the benefits, is a novel approach. This paper highlights the unique requirements of medical image data and proposes an innovative method to enhance model accuracy and reliability in medical diagnostics by removing background and redundant features from the images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.