ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
An automatic deep learning-based bone mineral density measurement method using X-ray images of children.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-Grained Differentiation-Based GNN for Auxiliary Diagnosis of Kashin-Beck Disease.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A combined model integrating deep learning, radiomics, and clinical ultrasound features for predictingFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a common bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD). Low BMD screening and early interventions during childhood can significantly decrease osteoporosis risk in adulthood. However, in clinical settings, the applicability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), a technique to measure standard area BMD (aBMD), cannot adequately meet the diagnostic needs of the majority of the Chinese population. We aimed to achieve a comprehensive evaluation in clinical settings by taking a single X-ray image, which, in conjunction with the use of equivalent step phantoms, can assess bone age or injuries (such as sprains, fractures, or breaks) in the wrist while also measuring aBMD in the forearm, to further evaluate growth and development. Methods: In the present study, we used routine X-ray images of the hand and forearm to measure aBMD with step phantom. First, based on the X-ray images, the regions of interest (ROIs) and step phantom used in clinical settings were automatically located and segmented; then, their average grayscale values were calculated. Second, after fitting the linear calibration relationship between the equivalent phantom thickness and grayscale value of the phantom, the effect of soft tissue on aBMD measurement was eliminated using a deep learning method. Finally, aBMD was measured. Results: Our developed method was validated on 500 X-ray images taken at the clinic and compared with DXA-based aBMD measurements. Experiments revealed that the average correlation coefficient was 0.836. Conclusions: The proposed method is an automatic method for measuring aBMD in children by utilizing X-ray images of hand and forearm. Furthermore, our findings suggest the effectiveness of the developed method, which provides a comparable performance to that of clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.