ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Evaluating failed dacryocystorhinostomy using computed tomography dacryocystography: a preliminary analysis of bony ostium characteristics in an Asian population.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the standard treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction, some surgeries are unsuccessful, and the reasons are not fully understood. By comparing successful and unsuccessful cases, this study investigated how computed tomography dacryocystography (CT-DCG) can help explain why these surgeries fail. Methods: This retrospective study included 34 failed and 16 successful DCR cases. The bony ostium was analyzed using CT-DCG with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. The ostium position, dimensions (width, height, total area, and shortest side), shape regularity, and presence of obstructing residual bone were measured and assessed. Preoperative nasal endoscopy was performed, and intraoperative findings were documented to supplement the CT-DCG data. Results: Properly sized and positioned ostia were found in only 14.7% of unsuccessful cases, compared to 100% in successful cases (P<0.001). Failed cases showed higher rates of irregular ostium shapes (47.1% Conclusions: CT-DCG provides valuable insights into ostium characteristics in failed DCR cases, including irregular ostium shape and residual obstructing bone. Although findings from nasal endoscopy and surgical observations were found to be supportive, more detailed and quantifiable information was provided by CT-DCG. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive preoperative assessment and meticulous surgical technique in DCR procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.