ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Image quality, diagnostic performance of reduced-dose abdominal CT with artificial intelligence model-based iterative reconstruction for colorectal liver metastasis: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility study of "double-low" scanning protocol combined with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography enhancement in patients with obesity.BMC medical imaging · 2025Trial
- Artificial intelligence iterative imaging reconstruction with low-dose CT scans for hepatic metastases.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing mesenteric vascular imaging with dual-energy CTA: a comparison of DLIR and ASIR-V using low contrast agent and low radiation dose protocols.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Combined with Low-Dose Aortic CTA for Preoperative Access Assessment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Two Deep Image Reconstructions for a 320-Row CT: Review of Clinical ApplicationsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Review
- Optimizing Chest Computed Tomography Imaging Protocols: A Narrative Review on Dose Reduction and Diagnostic Efficacy.Journal of medical physicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimization of regularization strategies in computed tomography (CT) iterative reconstruction may allow for a reduced dose (RD) without compromising image quality, thus the diagnostic ability of RD imaging must be considered, especially for low-contrast lesions. In this study, we evaluated the image quality and diagnostic performance of 50% RD CT for low-contrast colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) with artificial intelligence model-based iterative reconstruction (AIIR) and standard-dose (SD) CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Methods: In this prospective study, consecutive participants with pathologically proven colorectal cancer and suspected liver metastases who underwent portal venous phase CT scans both at SD and RD between June and November 2022 were included. All images were reconstructed by HIR and AIIR. Two radiologists detected and characterized liver lesions with RD HIR, SD HIR, and RD AIIR and scored the image quality. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for metastases were recorded. The diagnostic performance for CRLM of each reconstruction algorithm was analyzed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curves (AUC). Results: A total of 56 participants with 422 liver lesions were recruited. The mean volume CT dose indices of the SD and RD scans were 9.5 and 4.8 mGy. RD AIIR exhibited superior subjective image quality and higher CNR for liver metastases than did RD/SD HIR. In all liver lesions and lesions ≤10 mm, the detection rates of RD AIIR (83.3% and 71.5%) were both significantly higher than those of RD HIR (76.3% and 62.4%; P=0.002 and P=0.003); meanwhile, they were similar to those of SD HIR (81.4% and 69.6%; P=0.307 and P=0.515). The AUCs of RD AIIR for all liver lesions and lesions ≤10 mm (0.858 and 0.764) were greater than those of RD HIR (0.781 and 0.661; P<0.001) and were similar to those of SD HIR (0.863 and 0.762; P=0.616 and 0.845). Conclusions: AIIR can improve CT image quality at 50% RD while preserving diagnostic performance and confidence for low-contrast CRLM in all lesions and lesions ≤10 mm and may thus serve as a promising tool for follow-up monitoring in patients with colorectal cancer while inflicting less radiation damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.