Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160614›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics for multi-stage assisted diagnosis in reducing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4A lesions.

Xiangyu Lu, Yun Lu, Wuyuan Zhao, Yunliang Qi, Hongjuan Zhang, Wenhao Sun, Huaikun Zhang, Pei Ma, Ling Guan, Yide Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiangyu Lu *School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-6830
Yun Lu *Department of Ultrasound, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Wuyuan ZhaoSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yunliang QiZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, China.
Hongjuan ZhangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Wenhao SunSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Huaikun ZhangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Pei MaSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ling GuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Yide MaSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-7029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Even with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) guiding risk stratification on ultrasound (US) images, inconsistencies in diagnostic accuracy still exist, leading patients being subjected to unnecessary biopsies in clinical practice. This study investigated the construction of deep learning radiomics (DLR) models to improve the diagnostic consistency and reduce the unnecessary biopsies for BI-RADS 4A lesions. Methods: A total of 746 patients with breast lesions were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two DLR models based on US images and clinical variables were developed to conduct breast lesion risk re-stratification as BI-RADS 3 or lower and BI-RADS 4A or higher (DLR_LH), while simultaneously identifying BI-RADS 4A lesions with low malignancy probabilities to avoid unnecessary biopsy (DLR_BM). A three-round reader study with a two-stage artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis process was performed to verify the assistive capability and practical benefits of the models in clinical applications. Results: The DLR_LH model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.963 and 0.889 with sensitivities of 92.0% and 83.3%, in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The DLR_BM model exhibited AUCs of 0.977 and 0.942, with sensitivities of 94.1% and 86.4%, respectively. Both models were evaluated using integrated features of US images and clinical variables. Ultimately, 27.7% of BI-RADS 4A lesions avoided unnecessary biopsies. In the three-round reader study, all readers achieved significantly higher diagnostic accuracy and specificity, while maintaining outstanding sensitivity comparable to human experts, both before and after model assistance (P<0.05). These findings demonstrate the positive impact of the DLR models in assisting radiologists to enhance their diagnostic capabilities. Conclusions: The models performed well in breast US imaging interpretation and BI-RADS risk re-stratification, and demonstrated potential in reducing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4A lesions, indicating the promising applicability of the DLR models in clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System stratification (BI-RADS stratification)Breast tumordeep learning radiomics (DLR)diagnosisultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40160614
PMCPMC11948369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.