Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40160594›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Anticoagulation Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation in CKD Stage G5 and Dialysis Patients: An Updated Scoping Review.

Heitor Martins de Oliveira, Lorrany Pereira Barros, Maria Clara Azzi Vaz de Campos, Rafael Ferreira Daher, Gil Batista Gonçalves, Mateus Teodoro Sequeira, Silvia Marçal Botelho, Antonio da Silva Menezes Junior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heitor Martins de OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2535-9559
Lorrany Pereira BarrosFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8671-4748
Maria Clara Azzi Vaz de CamposFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1240-9394
Rafael Ferreira DaherFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2641-3574
Gil Batista GonçalvesDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74605-050 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2005-7779
Mateus Teodoro SequeiraDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74605-050 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-4265
Silvia Marçal BotelhoFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-1592
Antonio da Silva Menezes JuniorFaculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 74605-010 Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-5206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) often exclude patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), creating uncertainty regarding their safety and efficacy compared with warfarin. This study addresses this gap by providing key insights into anticoagulation in this high-risk population. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin and no anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with CKD stage G5 or on dialysis. This scoping review followed a six-stage framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An exhaustive search of four databases identified relevant papers published through August 2024. The data extraction process was conducted independently, with subsequent qualitative and quantitative analyses conducted. Among the 33 studies included in the final analysis, DOACs, particularly apixaban, were associated with a 20-30% decreased major bleeding risk compared to warfarin. Stroke incidence was comparable between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), with apixaban showing improved prevention in severe CKD. Observational studies reported slightly lower mortality rates with DOACs, particularly apixaban, including fewer cardiovascular-related deaths than with VKAs. DOACs, particularly apixaban and rivaroxaban, demonstrate a favorable safety profile compared to warfarin, but show inconsistent evidence in balancing thromboembolic prevention and bleeding risks in patients with AF and CKD stage G5 or on dialysis. Future studies should focus on optimizing dosing strategies and evaluating long-term safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

anticoagulationatrial fibrillationchronic kidney diseasedialysisdirect oral anticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID40160594
PMCPMC11951491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.